Engaging Perspectives

Finding Balance: What Q2 2025 Data Reveals About Credit Union Performance

Written by Fabio Biasella | 9/2/25 5:48 PM

The first half of 2025 is in the books. Credit unions managed the turbulence of these months with steadiness, showing modest but positive growth across membership, lending, deposits, and overall ROA. Yet averages only tell part of the story. They flatten nuance, especially when asset size reshapes the picture. The real fault-line lies in the relationship between Net Interest Margin (NIM) and Non-Interest Expense (NIE). 

At a glance, the sector looks healthy. On average, NIM outpaces NIE, suggesting that the primary revenue engine supports the expense base and leaves room for profitability. That storyline proves less universal once the data is segmented. 

What the Numbers Reveal 

  • Small credit unions under $100M post the highest NIM at 3.91%. Almost all of it is consumed by expenses, leaving only a 0.11 percent cushion. 
  • Mid-sized institutions between $100M and $999M face pressure. NIM declines as scale rises, but expenses remain stubborn. Those in the $500M to $999M bracket actually face a negative spread of 0.25 percent. 
  • Larger players from $1B to $2.99B still operate underwater, carrying an average spread of negative 0.12 percent. 
  • The turning point comes for institutions with assets between $3B and $4.99B, where efficiency finally breaks through and delivers a modest but consistent 0.14 percent advantage. 
  • Institutions above $5B demonstrate the full impact of scale, producing a 0.28 percent spread even though they operate with the slimmest NIM. Efficiency, not margin, is carrying them. 

Strategic Implications 

Efficiency as Differentiator 
Crossing the $3B mark reveals a pattern. Size alone does not guarantee stability; scale combined with operational discipline does. The institutions winning on spread are not just larger. They are leaner, with cost structures tuned to precision. 

Smaller Credit Unions Still Hold Cards 
Community connection and higher NIMs give smaller players room to compete. Yet without disciplined cost management, the cushion erodes quickly. Tight spending control, rigorous use of existing systems, and full deployment of digital tools become critical. Otherwise, reliance on non-interest income as a patch becomes unavoidable. For many, partnerships, shared services, and fintech alliances will no longer be optional but necessary to remain competitive. 

The Road Ahead 

The data points toward a strategic reality. Credit unions either grow deliberately by capturing more of the wallet from existing members or sharpen efficiency with urgency. Closing the efficiency gap before scale undermines flexibility is paramount for mid-sized institutions. For the largest players, reinvesting efficiency gains into innovation and deeper member experience will be the defining move. 

As fall strategic planning and budgeting begin, executives should scrutinize NIM and NIE trends, not in isolation but in motion. The narrowing gap, aided by repricing of maturing small business loans and higher yields on new originations, offers momentum. Institutions that align strategy with depth of relationship, operational clarity, and digital adaptability will be the ones that separate themselves. 

High performance has never been a matter of size alone. It belongs to those who stay member-focused, disciplined in execution, and agile enough to adjust as conditions shift.